Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Evans v. Winstar Mortgage Partners Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02278
Plaintiff: Anna Marie Evans
Defendant: Winstar Mortgage Partners Inc., Old Republic Default Management Services, Central Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romel Johnson v. Robert Horel
as 10-55016
Petitioner - Appellant: ROMEL JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, Warden
Custodio et al v. The County of Santa Clara, California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00527
Plaintiff: Mario Custodio, Mario Custodio, Mario Custodio and others
Defendant: The County of Santa Clara, California, Robert Davis, San Jose Police Department Sergeant Evans (Badge #2339) and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romel Hoyri-Hyri v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-75180
Petitioner: ROMEL HOYRI-HYRI
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Romell Tresvan v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv05077
Petitioner: Romell Tresvan
Respondent: State of California and M. Montel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romel White v. Mike Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-16387
Petitioner - Appellant: ROMEL VALENTINO WHITE
Respondent - Appellee: RICH SUBIA, Warden, Mule Creek State Prison and MIKE MARTEL, Warden
Romel v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00384
Petitioner: Elem Ralph Romel
Respondent: Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romelle Bradford v City of Seattle, et al
as 2:2007cv00365
Plaintiff: Romelle Bradford and Romelle Bradford
Defendant: Seattle City of, Seattle City of, Seattle City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?