Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Curtis Thompson v. Rob Mckenna
as 11-71888
Petitioner:
CURTIS S. THOMPSON
Respondent:
ROB MCKENNA, Attorney General
Thompson v. County of Sacramento Animal Control et al
as 1:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
Sherrie S. Thompson
Trustee:
Richard Martinez
Defendant:
County of Sacramento Animal Control, Dave Dickenson, Libby Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. McKenna
as 2:2011cv00178
Petitioner:
Curtis S. Thompson
Respondent:
Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2010cv05721
Plaintiff:
Channing Green
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, S. Thompson , M. Bloise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Sahota et al
as 2:2010cv03206
Plaintiff:
Henry A. Jones
Defendant:
Sahota, S. Thompson, Venderstyme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maidens v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00874
Defendant:
Brendon Alexander, Sgt. Cook, A. Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Maidens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra Club et al v. U.S. Defense Energy Support Center et al
as 3:2010cv02673
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy
Defendant:
U.S. Defense Energy Support Center, Kurt Kunkel, U.S. Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Thompson v. McGrue
as 3:2010cv01104
Plaintiff:
Tremile S. Thompson
Defendant:
Ericka McGrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00354
Plaintiff:
Tremile S. Thompson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Matthews, T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Simmons v. Peter Deuel, et al
as 09-35110
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID LEE SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER DEUEL, STEVEN LERICHE, HARDY MYERS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
J. BRENDON ALEXANDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
