Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Agnello et al v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02756
Plaintiff:
Melodie Agnello , Daniel Derose , Laureen Fromm and others
Defendant:
Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. and Tailored Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley Sayre v. J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC
as 18-55412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY SAYRE
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC
Bradley Sayre v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al
as 18-55411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY SAYRE
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JP MORGAN CHASE SECURITIES, LLC, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC and others
Sayre v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
as 3:2017cv02285
Petitioner:
Bradley Sayre
Respondent:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bruce Phillippi, II v. J. Kelso, et al
as 17-16667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE PHILLIPPI II
Defendant - Appellee:
J. CLARK KELSO, J. BAL, MAUREEN MCLEAN and others
Roy Warden v. Richard Miranda, et al
as 17-16640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MIRANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Tucson City Manager, MIKE RANKIN, individually and in his official capacity as Tucson City Attorney, CITY OF TUCSON and others
Sayre v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 3:2017cv00449
Plaintiff:
Bradley Sayre
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Securities, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simental v. Adams et al
as 3:2017cv00801
Plaintiff:
Rudy Simental
Defendant:
N. Adams, M. Sayre, J. Bal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Thomas et al
as 3:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Lewis Dominic Shaw
Defendant:
L. Thomas, B. Fellows, M. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
