Cases 21 - 30 of 1,860
Leung et al v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2024cv01195
Defendant:
Alan B. Graf, Jr., Peter B. Henry, Monica Gil and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Leung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bishop v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Travis Allan Bishop
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Bean, et al.
as 24-4317
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and JEREMY BEAN
Petitioner:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Jolene Acosta et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05885
Plaintiff:
Percival Agcopra, Travis Adams, Balghies Ahmadpour and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, Inc., Waste Connections US, Inc., Chiquita Canyon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Torts to Land
Ji v. Pennington
as 4:2024cv04176
Respondent:
Travis Pennington
Petitioner:
Sang Lim Ji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Barker
as 24-4202
Defendant:
TRAVIS O'NEAL BARKER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Navy Federal Credit Union v. McEntire et al
as 2:2024cv01699
Plaintiff:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Wendy Armstrong and Travis McEntire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Duro v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2024cv04165
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Travis Peter Duro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Estate of Kamren Nettles et al v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv05756
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Travis Nelson, Paula Tokar and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kamren Nettles, Keith Nettles and Tennel Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Future Motion Inc
as 5:2024cv04077
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
