Cases 21 - 30 of 906
Foley v. Pima County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Pima County Adult Detention Center, Unknown Party, Robert Koumal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casteel v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
Everett Gregory Casteel
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Hunter, Jr.
as 1:2023mc00069
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Everett Earl Hunter, Jr
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Shoshone County Jail
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
James Everett Spencer
Defendant:
Shoshone County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. USA
as 3:2023cv01071
Petitioner:
Everett Justin Curtis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramsdell v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00973
Plaintiff:
Keith W Ramsdell
Defendant:
Sheridyn Miller, Kevin Galbreath, Pascal Koulemou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foley v. Pima County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Pima County Adult Detention Center, Unknown Party, Linda Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett Spillard v. Cueva
as 23-15736
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVERETT SPILLARD
Respondent / Appellee:
CUEVA, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
