Cases 31 - 40 of 18,599
Dominguez v. Bass et al
as 5:2024cv06420
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dominguez
Defendant:
Sgt. M. Taylor, c/o E. Castillo, Sgt. E. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollin et al v. Liang et al
as 5:2024cv06410
Defendant:
Daniel W. Fairfax, Tally Liu, Shiu Leung Chan and others
Plaintiff:
Super Micro Computer, Inc. and Lawrence Hollin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv06414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ferguson et al v. Kootenai Health Inc.
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Pam Gage and Daniel Ferguson
Defendant:
Kootenai Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Daniels v. Kotek et al
as 2:2024cv01538
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, Downs, Tina Kotek and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah David Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00416
Defendant:
John Doe Bobiner, T. Valley, Klinton R. Hust and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Raheem Rumford Bey v. City of Lancaster California et al
as 2:2024mc00106
Plaintiff:
Tony Raheem Rumford Bey
Defendant:
City of Lancaster California, Sheriff Robert Luna, Attorney General Garland and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
