Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Scarberry v. Randall et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ms Kendra Scarberry
Defendant:
Jonathan Randall, United States Department of the Air Force and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kotab v. U.S. Department of the Air Force et al
as 2:2018cv02031
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, Anthony M Kurta, U.S. Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas X Kotab
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Smith v. David Grant Medical Center et al
as 3:2018cv04185
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
David Grant Medical Center and U.S. Department of the Air Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zaldivar #166954 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01160
Plaintiff:
Jose Adalberto Zaldivar, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Dora Schriro, Unknown O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulter v. Department of the Air Force of the United States of America et al
as 2:2018at00133
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coulter
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force of the United States of America and Deborah Lee James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Darlynn v. Department of the Air Force et al
as 2:2017cv02800
Plaintiff:
Juanitta Darlynn
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force and Christopher Mark Sherman
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jose Zaldivar, Sr. v. USAF, et al
as 17-15582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ADALBERTO ZALDIVAR, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, NATIONAL PERSONNEL RECORDS CENTER, AIR FORCE SAFETY CENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00744
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
