Cases 31 - 40 of 530
Houston Specialty Insurance Company v. Rekowski et al
as 2:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
Houston Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Leah Rekowski, Carmelo Patino, Brandy White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Hertel v. Errez et al
as 3:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Christy Hertel
Defendant:
Ben Errez, Fredi Nisan, J. Drew Byelick and others
Petitioner:
Marcus Gazaway
Drew DaltonIn re: Drew Dalton
as 23-80052
Respondent:
In re: DREW D. DALTON, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: October 3, 2017
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Lauer et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Tarontae D. Jackson
Defendant:
Drew Lauer, Rocco Gusmano, Darryl Kelley, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hunthausen v. Buzzfeed, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Drew Hunthausen
Defendant:
Buzzfeed, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as www.buzzfeed.com and Buzzfeed, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as www dot buzzfeed dot com
Intervenor:
United States of America
Wilcox et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilcox and Drew Wilcox
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC doing business as Ram
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
(PS) Maqaddem v. People of the State of CA, et al
as 2:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Lala Maha Maqaddem
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Amber Gordon, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Drew Witzig v. David Shinn
as 23-15536
Petitioner / Appellant:
DREW MICHAEL WITZIG
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
