Cases 31 - 40 of 1,410
Dwight M. McDowell v. Danny Samuel
as 2:2023cv03192
Petitioner:
Dwight M. McDowell
Respondent:
Danny Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrek Gilliam v. USA
as 23-35258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERREK DWIGHT GILLIAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, substituted for Neighbor Care Health and Dr. James Tzen
Brandy Sandoval v. Douglas County Jail and Staff, et al
as 23-35167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDY MARIE SANDOVAL
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS COUNTY JAIL AND STAFF, POE, Deputy, CHILDER'S, Deputy and others
Gary Rosales v. Q. Byrne, et al
as 23-15081
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY CRAIG ROSALES
Respondent / Appellee:
Q. BYRNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
(PC) DeBose v. Third Watch Commander et al
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dwight M. DeBose
Defendant:
Third Watch Commander, Robert Fox, R Guitierez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Posey v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 23-15044
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MERITT POSEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JEREMY BEAN and others
Dwight Jobe, Jr. v. Harris et al
as 5:2022cv02276
Plaintiff:
Dwight Jobe, Jr.
Defendant:
Harris, Grajeda, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Dwight Weems
as 22-30211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DWIGHT ANTHONY WEEMS
Crystal Zurba v. Church and Dwight Co., Inc.
as 8:2022cv02121
Plaintiff:
Crystal Zurba
Defendant:
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Church and Dwight Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
