Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 200
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Ventura v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv06799
Defendant: Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Ventura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Bingham County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00294
Defendant: Auburn Pharmaceutical, McKesson Corporation, Thrifty Payless, Inc and others
Plaintiff: Bingham County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Idaho v. Endo Health Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00286
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Endo International PLC and others
Plaintiff: Idaho Attorney Gen Lawrence G Wasden and State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Chubbuck v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00278
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff: City of Chubbuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucson Medical Center v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00358
Defendant: Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Purdue Pharma LP, Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff: Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Twin Falls v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al.
as 4:2019cv00303
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff: City of Twin Falls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Alameda, California et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02307
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: County of Alameda, California and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prescott, City of v. Allergan PLC et al
as 3:2019cv08165
Defendant: Actavis Incorporated, Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff: Prescott, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?