Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Steven Force v. Melvin Hunter, et al
as 09-56294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DANIEL FORCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MELVIN HUNTER, in his individual and official capacity, DAVE BOURNE, in his individual and official capacity, MICHAEL HUGHES, in his individual and official capacity and others
Demos v. Boening et al
as 2:2009mc00117
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Van Boening, Perry Bartram, F. Longano and others
Helm v. Hughes et al
as 3:2009cv05381
Plaintiff:
George-Jason A Helm
Defendant:
Michael Hughes, Janet Gaines and Sean Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aifang Shi v. Ruth Carlson, et al
as 09-15033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIFANG SHI
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH E. CARLSON, JON M. STEVENS, MICHAEL HUGHES and others
Shi v. Central Arizona College et al
as 5:2008mc80131
Plaintiff:
Aifang Shi
Defendant:
Central Arizona College, Ruth E. Carlson, Jon M. Stevens and others
Steven Force v. Melvin Hunter, et al
as 08-55990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DANIEL FORCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MELVIN HUNTER, DAVE BOURNE, MICHAEL HUGHES and others
Shi v. Central Arizona College et al
as 2:2007cv01147
Plaintiff:
Aifang Shi
Defendant:
Central Arizona College, Ruth E Carlson, Jon M Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NOT USED
as 2:2007cv00657
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Anne Duncombe
Defendant:
Alexander Dawson School at Rainbow Mountain, LLC, Mario Borini and H. Michael Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00656
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2005cv02372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
