Cases 31 - 40 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Edwards, Unknown Down and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Means v. Airgas USA, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv02160
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Franklin Means
Robles v. The Regents of the University of California, Berkeley et al
as 3:2017cv03235
Plaintiff:
Kiara Robles
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of California, Berkeley , Janet Napolitano , Monica Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv02142
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith, Rexford Martin, Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company v. Guillalme Means et al
as 2:2017cv02586
Defendant:
Does, Eartha Dean Lynn, Guillalme Means and others
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company
Glenn Winningham v. Donald Baker, et al
as 17-15243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN WINNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD BAKER, Deputy Clerk, DONALD B. VERILLI, Jr., Wrongdoer; US Solicitor General, ERIK FOSSUM, Wrongdoer; Deputy Clerk and others
Winningham v. Baker et al
as 2:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant:
Donald Baker, Donald B Verilli, Jr., Erik Fossum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Means v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2016cv05753
Plaintiff:
David Means
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
