Cases 31 - 40 of 422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03806
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Matterport, Inc et al
as 3:2022cv03704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lynch
Defendant:
Matterport, Inc, RJ Pittman, Dave Gausebeck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
Xavier Pittman
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco and Zachary McAuliffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Robert Pittman
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Aviva Kirsten et al v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
as 2:2021cv09578
Plaintiff:
Aviva Kirsten and Jeremy Pittman
Defendant:
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08194
Plaintiff:
Kaelon Pittman
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
