Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv03094
Plaintiff: Shawna Hartmann
Defendant: California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California State Personnel Board, Division of Adult Institutions and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00045
Plaintiff: Shawna Hartmann and Caren Hill
Defendant: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , California State Personnel Board , Division of Adult Institutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2008at01532
Plaintiff: Shawna Hartmann
Defendant: California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, State Personnel Board, Division of Adult Institutions and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sayles v. USA
as 2:2008cv03837
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Uzeegoa Makeba Sayles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sayles v. Clark County Detention Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00088
Plaintiff: Darryl E. Sayles
Defendant: Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McIntosh et al v. Barth et al
as 2:2007cv01287
Plaintiff: Samora McIntosh, Sheldon McIntosh, Theodore McDowell and others
Defendant: Michael Barth, James Blomo, Sheila Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cintas Corporation v. Barnes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2006cv05113
Petitioner: Cintas Corporation
Respondent: Relton Barnes, Christopher Baumer, Tyrone Charles Benedict and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?