Cases 31 - 40 of 3,007
Iseli v. The State of California et. al.
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
The State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick #248576 v. Cardinale et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Harvey Kendrick
Defendant:
Vincent Cardinale, John Willis, R Harkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. InMarket Media, LLC
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Autry Willis
Defendant:
InMarket Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henderson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Henderson
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Sr., Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Davis v. People of San Joaquin
as 2:2024cv00734
Petitioner:
Willis Davis
Respondent:
People of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iseli v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California, County of San Joaquin, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis-Albrigo et al v. Motts, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Laura Willis-Albrigo and Tiffany Taylor
Defendant:
Motts, LLP and Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
