Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Mountz, Inc. v. Northeast Industrial Bolting and Torque, LLC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv04538
Plaintiff: Mountz, Inc.
Defendant: Northeast Industrial Bolting and Torque, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05551
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
American Automobile Insurance Company, et al v. Hawaii Nut & Bolt, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00245
Plaintiff: American Automobile Insurance Company and National Surety Corporation
Defendant: Hawaii Nut & Bolt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Raymond Bolt v. Mark Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35083
Petitioner - Appellant: RAYMOND ONWARD BOLT
Respondent - Appellee: MARK NOOTH
Matthew Dury v. Paul Copenhaver, et al
as 13-16120
Plaintiff - Appellant: MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL COPENHAVER, J. ZARAGOZA, BOLT and others
Dury v. Bolt, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00278
Plaintiff: Matthew James Dury
Defendant: Lt Bolt , Puttnam , Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dury v. Copenhaver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00116
Plaintiff: Matthew James Dury
Defendant: Paul Copenhaver, J. Zaragoza, Lt Bolt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bolt v. Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01660
Petitioner: Raymond Onward Bolt
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Bolt v. James Laney et al
as 2:2012mc00221
Plaintiff: William Bolt
Defendant: James Laney
William Bolt v. James Laney et al
as 2:2012mc00222
Plaintiff: William Bolt
Defendant: James Laney

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?