Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 194
Barlow v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03568
Plaintiff: James Barlow
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kesling v. Tewalt, et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant: Henry Atencio, Stephanie Trobock, Noel Barlow-Hust and others
Plaintiff: Shawn M Kesling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00151
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00341
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Barlow v. Sunia, et al
as 1:2018cv00423
Petitioner: Mr. James Glenn Barlow and James Glenn Barlow
Respondent: Mr. Tauese Va'aomala Sunia, Soliali'i Falepo and Tauese Va'aomala Sunia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In the Matter of Barlow Smith - #80680 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018mc80150
Defendant: Barlow Smith - #80680
Respondent: Barlow Smith
Pringle v. Gentry et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant: Cindy McDonald, Judy Mesick, Shannon Cluney and others
Plaintiff: Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018at01231
Plaintiff: Pamela Denise Pringle
Defendant: Brent Cardall, County of Yolo, Yolo County Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pringle v. Cardall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02035
Defendant: Cindy McDonald, Brent Cardall, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff: Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pamela Pringle v. Amanda Gentry, et al
as 18-16038
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE
Defendant - Appellee: AMANDA GENTRY, SHANNON CLUNEY, NOEL BARLOW-HUST and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?