Cases 41 - 50 of 319
Jeffrey Mills, et al v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 23-15945
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY MILLS, GEORGE E. COLES, OLLIE L. BRYANT, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, JOSEPH BICK, DEAN BORDERS, Warden and others
Gil Tzun v. Allison et al
as 3:2023cv03258
Plaintiff:
Armando Gil Tzun
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ronald Broomfield, Katherine Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hickson v. Broomfield
as 1:2023cv03233
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Hickson
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Bradford v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-99005
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN BRADFORD
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Irving v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv02949
Petitioner:
Daniel D Irving
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Joseph Ochoa v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-15836
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH OCHOA, Administrative Law Judge and JOSEPH OCHOA
Respondent / Appellee:
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul Johnson v. Ronald Broomfield, et al
as 23-15376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden and L. TOBIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
