Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Darrell Parks v. L. Ferguson, et al
as 13-55758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. FERGUSON, Correctional Counselor, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, TIMOTHY BAKER, Case Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, MARK TIPTON, Unit Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity and others
Guurdhweel Q.Gheyttuarneaux v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv02949
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Richard B Ives and Charles E Samuels, Jr
Plaintiff:
Guurdhweel Q. Gheyttuarneaux
Steven Fishman v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv02677
Petitioner:
Steven Fishman
Respondent:
Warden Conrad Graber, Director Charles E Samuels, Jr and United States of America
Gheyttuarneaux v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv01630
Plaintiff:
Guurdhweel Q. Gheyttuarneaux
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lebaron L Harris et al v. J Jackson et al
as 5:2013cv00649
Defendant:
Randall Bacon, Krista Bahre, B A Bledsoe and others
Plaintiff:
Lebaron L Harris
Moore v. Samuels
as 4:2013cv00190
Petitioner:
Ira Jerome Moore
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Darrell Parks v. L Ferguson et al
as 5:2013cv00470
Defendant:
Randall Bacon, Krista Bahre, Timothy Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Benjamin Schwarz et al v. Erwin Meinberg et al
as 2:2013cv00356
Defendant:
Brenda Burch, Juan D Castillo, William F Dalius, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin R Schwarz and Stephen Yagman
M.G. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv02956
Plaintiff:
M.G.
Defendant:
United States of America , Charles E. Samuels and Unknown Federal Agents or Employees (Does 1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
