Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 91
CTIA - The Wireless Ass'n v. City of Berkeley, et al
as 16-15141
Defendant / Appellee: CHRISTINE DANIEL, City Manager of Berkeley, California, in her official capacity and CITY OF BERKELEY, California
Plaintiff / Appellant: CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL ADVERTISERS, INC., AMERICAN BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2019at01142
Plaintiff: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Home Care Association of America, California Association for Health Services at Home and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Lilia Garcia Brower, Julie A. Su and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55504
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
American Cable Association et al v. Becerra We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02684
Defendant: Xavier Becerra
Plaintiff: NCTA - The Internet & Television Association, CTIA - The Wireless Association, American Cable Association and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. State of California et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02660
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and State of California
Plaintiff: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EDF v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73383
Petitioner: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Intervenor: AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, AMERICAN COATINGS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN COKE AND COAL CHEMICALS INSTITUTE and others
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, et al v. City of Seattle, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35640
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle
Amicus Curiae: ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS
Amicus Curiae - Pending: DAN CLARK, TAMI DUNLAP, ALI HASSON, JENNIFER IMMEL, GARY KUNZE, ELISABETH LOWE, DALE MONTZ, ABDI MOTAN, FREDERICK RICE, MICHAEL RIEBS, and FIREW TESHOME. and LYFT, INC.
Chamber of Commerce of the Uni, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 17-35371
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. City of Seattle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00370
Plaintiff: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Defendant: City of Seattle , Seattle Department of Finance and Administrative Services and Fred Podesta
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Spencer Abrams, et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al
as 17-80001
Plaintiff - Respondent: SPENCER ABRAMS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., LONNIE M. SMITH, GARY S. GUTHART and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAW PROFESSORS and FORMER SEC OFFICIALS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?