Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
D.C. et al v. Molombo Thillot et al
as 2:2020cv11765
Defendant:
NEW PRIME, INC., a Corporation, ALEX FARNSWORTH, MARTIN JANSS and others
Plaintiff:
H.C, a minor, D.C., a minor, Winifred Robert White Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Deon Jones v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2020cv11147
Defendant:
Does 2-10 inclusive, Doe 1, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10354
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mendell v. Doe, et al.
as 1:2020cv00499
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Mendell
Defendant:
John & Jane Doe 2-10 and I John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grange v. Prestige Financial Services Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01561
Plaintiff:
Todd Grange
Defendant:
John & Jane Does 2-10, Prestige Financial Services Inc., Repossession Company Auto Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
John W. Moody, III v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv01857
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Does, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Moody, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
1940 Carmen, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2020cv08130
Defendant:
Does 2-10 inclusive, Dyneka Collier, Unknown City of Los Angeles Police Officer sued as Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Marshall, 1940 Carmen, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Alexander Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
