Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Estate of Jimmy Ray Hatfield et al v. County of Lake et al
as 1:2011cv02396
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jimmy Ray Hatfield , R. H. , K. H. and others
Defendant:
County of Lake, Lake County Sheriff's Department, Rodney Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little-Findley v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2011cv00284
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Plaintiff:
Angelina D. Little-Findley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael Holmberg v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 11-35146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HOLMBERG
Defendant:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, RON VAN BOENING, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clemons v. Mitchel et al
as 3:2010cv03832
Plaintiff:
John L. Clemons
Defendant:
Rodney Mitchel, James Bauman, Wichlaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks et al v. McCluskey et al
as 3:2010cv08055
Plaintiff:
Edward Faye Parks and Amelia French
Defendant:
Mike McCluskey, Findley-Noelte Honda and Bank of the West Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks et al v. McCluskey et al
as 2:2010cv00759
Plaintiff:
Edward Faye Parks and Amelia French
Defendant:
Mike McCluskey, Findley Nolle Honda and Bank of the West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Parks v. Findley-Noelte Honda
as 10-15685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FAYE PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FINDLEY-NOELTE HONDA, Kingman, Arizona
Parks v. Findley-Noelte Honda
as 3:2009cv08103
Plaintiff:
Edward Faye Parks
Defendant:
Findley-Noelte Honda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: John Findley, III, et al v. John Findley, III
as 08-60024
Debtor:
In re: JOHN WILLIAM FINDLEY, III
Appellant:
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, a Public Corporation
Appellee:
JOHN WILLIAM FINDLEY, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
