Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Jones v. Special Commitment Center et al
as 3:2014cv05018
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jones
Defendant:
Special Commitment Center , Mark Strong , Todd Dubble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
James Stanley Jones v. M. Biter
as 2:2013cv06751
Respondent:
M. Biter
Petitioner:
James Stanley Jones
James Jones v. Steve Franke
as 13-35806
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LOUIS JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE FRANKE
Quad Knopf, Inc. v. South Valley Biology Consulting, LLC et al
as 1:2013at00555
Plaintiff:
Quad Knopf, Inc.
Defendant:
South Valley Biology Consulting, LLC, James W. Jones, Jr., Jason H. Kang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Quad Knopf, Inc. v. South Valley Biology Consulting, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01262
Plaintiff:
Quad Knopf, Inc.
Defendant:
South Valley Biology Consulting, LLC, James W. Jones, Jr., Jason H. Kang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Jones, Jr. v. Recon Trust Company, et al
as 13-16481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. JONES, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
RECON TRUST COMPANY, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and BANK OF AMERICA, NA, a national bank
Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv01145
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
James Stanley Jones v. M D Biter
as 2:2013cv02856
Respondent:
M D Biter
Petitioner:
James Stanley Jones
Jones v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jones
Defendant:
State of Washington, Harry Hoberman, Kristie Barham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
