Cases 41 - 50 of 873
Wells et al v. Federal Aviation Administration et al
as 3:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Paul Wells, Kimberly June Wells, Justin Lunn and others
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration, Howard Martin, Patrick Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
In re: Douglas Davies
as 22-80085
Respondent:
In re: DOUGLAS LOWELL DAVIES, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 18, 2003
Lydia McCoy v. USDC-ORP
as 22-70163
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LYDIA MCCOY, LORRAINE MCCORMICK, STEVEN TUREAU and others
Petitioner:
LYDIA MCCOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Rebekah Seal et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04996
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Seal, Joanne Senat, Arturo Senti and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Craig Furusho
as 22-80064
Respondent:
In re: CRAIG K. FURUSHO, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 4, 1984
USA v. June Gibson
as 22-10164
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUNE GIBSON
Wilson v. Garland
as 22-1060
Petitioner:
JUNE MODUPEH WILSON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rosemary D'Augusta, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70119
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA, BRENDA DAVIS, PAMELA FAUST and others
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Vanloan et al v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Vanloan
Defendant:
The Nation of Islam, Louis Farrafhan, Tony Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
(PC) Strickland v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Strickland
Defendant:
A. Jenkins, Junes, - Saechao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
