Cases 41 - 50 of 224
Aaron Linsky v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
as 2:2018cv07948
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Aaron Linsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neville McKnight v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv05900
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Neville McKnight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Guenther v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
as 18-15823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GUENTHER
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CERTAIN SALARIED EMPLOYEES
Leslie Wiggins v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 2:2018cv02182
Defendant:
DOES and Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff:
Leslie Wiggins
Wallace v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 2:2018cv00463
Plaintiff:
Stacy Wallace
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Badkin v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv05910
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lyle Badkin
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 160 and Local Lodge 282
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Becky Nguyen v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 17-17027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BECKY NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Charles Guenther v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
as 17-16984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GUENTHER
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CERTAIN SALARIED EMPLOYEES
Sujata Vyas v. Bhaskar Vyas, et al
as 17-56413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUJATA VYAS, Dr.
Defendant - Appellee:
BHASKAR VYAS, an individual, LOCKHEED MARTIN PENSION PLAN, NANCY BUNN, an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
