Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Gholson v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2015cv01934
Defendant:
Fabian Carrillo, Casa Grande Transitional Housing, N. Childers and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl E. Gholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Shari Beneda et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04267
Plaintiff:
John Beneda, Shari Beneda, Doris Cater and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Griffin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Griffin
Defendant:
Gonzales, Hill, R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of California et al
as 3:2014cv04231
Plaintiff:
Damon Charles Williams
Defendant:
State of California, County of Alameda, Michael J. Gaffey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Miller et al
as 5:2014cv04215
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith
Defendant:
R. Miller and K. Ancheta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FCM Capital Partners LLC v. Regent Corporate Consulting Limited et al
as 2:2014cv07099
Defendant:
Does, John Grice, John R Miller and others
Plaintiff:
FCM Capital Partners LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-36044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Miller, Jr., et al v. USDC-CASJ
as 13-73539
:
In re: DANIEL R. MILLER, Jr., PATRICE MILLER, PASHLIN, INC, a coropration and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL R. MILLER, Jr., PATRICE MILLER, PASHLIN, INC, a coropration and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
NOREEN CARDINALE
Miller v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05684
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Miller
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Roberts v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Lisa Roberts
Defendant:
Theodore E Miller , Lisa R Miller , Ted Miller Construction Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
