Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-17032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-16669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Martin v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv00402
Defendant:
Norman Halverson, D. Helling, James Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth G. Keel v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv07591
Petitioner:
Terry Philpott, Danny Bell, George Lincoln Coats and others
Defendant:
Justice For Homicde Victims, Inc., Pete Wilson, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Keel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Melvin Freitas, Jr. v. T. Thoma
as 10-73872
Petitioner:
MELVIN DE FREITAS, Jr.
Respondent:
T. THOMAS
Rodenhurst vs. State of Hawaii; et al.
as 2:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Walter V Rodenhurst, III
Defendant:
Kay Bauman , Kenneth Zienkiewicz , Frank J Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodenhurst vs. State of Hawaii; et al.
as 9:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Walter V Rodenhurst, III
Defendant:
Kay Bauman , Kenneth Zienkiewicz , Frank J. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vince Razo v. T. Thoma
as 10-16300
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCE WILLIAM RAZO
Respondent - Appellee:
T. THOMAS, Warden, Saguaro Correctional Center
Randy Thomas, et al v. USDCSF
as 10-71344
:
In re: RANDY L. THOMAS and ALFRED T. THOMAS
Petitioner:
RANDY L. THOMAS and ALFRED T. THOMAS
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
AIDA CORREA, AKA Aida Correa Vazquez, AKA Aida Correa Velez
Randy Thomas, et al v. Aida Correa
as 10-15250
Plaintiff:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
AIDA CORREA, AKA Aida Correa Vazquez, AKA Aida Correa Velez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
