Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Rudisill v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Rudisill
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Tamara Porter, Lisa Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv08233
Plaintiff:
Tamara Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis-Randolph v. Arizona Department of Child Safety et al
as 2:2016cv03158
Plaintiff:
Shirea Anita Davis-Randolph
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Child Safety, Bonnie Nicole Platter, Tamara Twellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Lucy Burciaga, Tracy Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Richard L Richards
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderso Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00149
Plaintiff:
David E Walker and Tamara Radford
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Tamara L Thompson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02528
Plaintiff:
Tamara Demia Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McAllister et al v. Halls et al
as 2:2015cv02204
Plaintiff:
Chad McAllister , Jordan McAllister , Mind Smoothie LLC and others
Defendant:
Alan Halls , Tamara Halls and Course Saver LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
