Cases 51 - 60 of 8,820
Ayala-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2699
Petitioner:
JESUS ALBERTO AYALA-RODRIGUEZ, INGRID ARELY LAINEZ-DE AYALA, ALEXI ARNOLDO AYALA-LAINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Wilson v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Combs Wilson
Defendant:
C. Molina, J. Banania, B. Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Lara v. Garland
as 24-2569
Petitioner:
SEGUNDO PASTOR RODRIGUEZ-LARA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bravo, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2602
Plaintiff:
GLORIA DELIA BRAVO and DALILA RODRIGUEZ CUEVAS
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Rodriguez-Merida, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2597
Petitioner:
GEINER YESICA RODRIGUEZ-MERIDA and BELLALETH ISAYDI VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Rodriguez v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. Rodriguez
as 1:2024at00340
Plaintiff:
Zenaida Cordova
Defendant:
Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alyssa A. Williams et al v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Alyssa A. Williams, Jacob Williams and LeRoy M. Woods
Petitioner:
Patricia Borello and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana and Police Chief Robert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Rodriguez
Respondent:
John Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Francis Joe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
