Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Banks v. Roe et al
as 1:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Forbes et al.
as 6:2017cv00061
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00806
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
State of Hawaii v. Trump
as 1:2017cv00050
Defendant:
Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, State of Oregon, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Intervenor:
Frederick Banks, Ph.D. Vincent Lucas, Joseph Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Frederick Banks v. Crooked Hilary et al
as 2:2016cv07954
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
John Brennan, Hilary Rodham Clinton, FBI Director James Comey and others
Frederick Banks v. Brianna Keilar et al
as 2:2016cv07398
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
John Brennan, CIA, CNN and others
Frederick Banks v. Disney et al
as 2:2016cv05554
Defendant:
Danny Banks, John Brennan, Senator Richard Burr and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hornack et al
as 2:2016cv01151
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
CIA, Robert Celler, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
