Cases 51 - 60 of 193
Stephen Finn v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00476
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Stephen Finn
Finn v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2016cv05285
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Finn
Defendant:
Kelleen F. Sullivan, Caireen M.T. Sullivan, Sean J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16368
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
JOHN FINN and LAURA TOWNSEND FORTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Brummett v. Jones et al
as 1:2016cv00205
Petitioner:
David Brummett
Respondent:
Sandy Jones and Brian Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brummett v. Idaho Parole Board Members et al
as 1:2016cv00198
Petitioner:
David Brummett
Respondent:
Idaho Parole Board Members, Sandy Jones, Janie Dressen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sullivan v. Finn
as 3:2016cv01948
Plaintiff:
Joanna C Sullivan
Defendant:
Stephen A. Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regence BlueShield v. Finn et al
as 1:2016cv03011
Plaintiff:
Regence BlueShield
Defendant:
Susan Finn , Douglas W Nicholson and Lathrop Winbauer Harrel Slothower & Denison, LLP
Counter_claimant:
Susan Finn
Counter_defendant:
Regence BlueShield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Regence BlueShield v. Finn et al
as 2:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Regence BlueShield
Defendant:
Susan Finn, Douglas W Nicholson and Lathrop Winbauer Harrel Slothower & Denison, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Loman v. Finn et al
as 1:2015cv00543
Petitioner:
Henry Loman
Respondent:
Finn and State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sven Hemmert, et al v. David Finn, et al
as 3:2015cv04904
Plaintiff:
Sven Hemmert , Sue-Ellen Speight and C.H.
Defendant:
David Finn , Amy Finn , National Park Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
