Cases 51 - 60 of 918
Stanley, Jr. v. Malondondo et al
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Rodric Petrece Stanley, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Malondondo, Sgt Lynch, Sgt. Rodier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Jensen v. The People
as 3:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Jacob Jensen
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jensen v. Wills et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Peter Christian Jensen, IV
Defendant:
Kedrick Wills, Jonathan Cushman, John Cafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCaulou-Bernatz et al v. Insurance Supermarket, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Nancy McCaulou-Bernatz and Paul Jensen
Defendant:
Insurance Supermarket, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dean Manes v. Raymond Kaecker, et al
as 22-56225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAN MANES
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND KAECKER, AU SPORTS AND GRAPHICS, KRISTEN WELCH, individual: official capacity and others
Rindal v. Inslee et al
as 2:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Steve Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayton v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv06015
Plaintiff:
James Edward Clayton and Okie Redpaw
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Casey Kaech, Lara Stick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sevirino v. Jensen, et al.
as 1:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Jovy Kathleen Sevirino
Defendant:
James D. Jensen and Aspen R. Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kent Williams v. Fox, et al
as 22-36014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
FOX, Guard, HILLNER, Ada County Jail Guard, 4199, BROOKS, Guard and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
