Cases 51 - 60 of 139
Susan Marcos-Chavela v. Joe Biden, et al
as 23-35176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN MARCOS-CHAVELA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA D. HARRIS, TINA KOTEK and others
Danna Vongamath v. Tommy Chen Bui
as 5:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Danna Vongamath
Defendant:
Tommy Chen Bui, Gavin Newsom, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Olms, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caraffa v. Shinn et al
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurion Medical, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton Everett Nelson et al v.King Charles III et al
as 2:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Clinton Everett Nelson and All African Americans
Defendant:
Charles King, III, Pope Francis and Joe Biden
Watzke v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Watzke
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Charles Watzke, Vladmir Putin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Donald J Trump, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv08709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Thistle v. Joe Biden, et al
as 22-56167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JOHN THISTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, President of the United States and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
(HC) Barnes v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv02175
Petitioner:
Antoine DeShawn Barnes
Respondent:
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
