Cases 51 - 60 of 138
Finck #058578 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00282
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Finck
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frost v. San Mateo Superior Court
as 3:2018cv02496
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Frost
Respondent:
San Mateo Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brandon Alexander Favor v. Nancy Svetich Pogue et al
as 2:2018cv01800
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, County of Los Angeles Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alexander Favor
Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Pogue et al
as 1:2018cv00271
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alexander Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Nancy Svetich Pogue, Fannie Owu, Valarie Anelle Roacha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tilton v. Kernan et al
as 2:2017cv01738
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Tilton
Defendant:
Scott Kernan and Kevin Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Aguilar v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD AGUILAR
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director at ADOC, MIKE LINDERMAN, Administrator of Pastoral Services at ADOC, DOE, Department Dietician at ADOC and others
Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00980
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Daniel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patron v. Geico Casualty Company
as 2:2017cv00337
Defendant:
Geico Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Patron
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Michael Jackson v. USA
as 17-35036
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Aguilar v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-17229
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD AGUILAR
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
