Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 13-56004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R. OLSON, Correctional Counselor II and E. MARRERO
Jamali v. Low et al
as 2:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant:
Stephanie Danica Low, William Moore, Michael W Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00975
Petitioner:
Alden Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Kamala D Harris, Williams Suglich, E Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Harris et al
as 4:2013cv01692
Plaintiff:
Alden Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris, Williams Suglich, E. Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Medina v. B. Morris, et al
as 13-55617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
B. MORRIS, Facility Captain at RJD, D. K. MCBRIDE, Associate Warden of RJD, P. A. CORTEZ, Correctional Counselor at RJD and others
Lucien Marrero v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2013cv01916
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Lucien Marrero
Moore v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00347
Plaintiff:
Alden Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris , Williams Suglich, E. Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro Marrero v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 13-70512
Petitioner:
PEDRO JOSE MARRERO
Respondent:
DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden
Jamali v. Hyatt et al
as 2:2012cv02702
Plaintiff:
Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant:
Emma Hyatt, Amy Jane Hyatt, David Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Marrero v. US Bank National Association et al
as 8:2012cv01588
Defendant:
Does, Meridian Foreclosure Service and US Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Simon Marrero
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
