Cases 51 - 60 of 1,242
Maupin v. County of Tulare et al
as 1:2023at00727
Petitioner:
Shayne Maupin
Defendant:
County of Tulare, Tulare County Sheriff's Office, Estefani Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mooring v. Padilla
as 4:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Travis Mooring
Respondent:
Margaret Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Xochitl Padilla-Barron v. Warden
as 2:2023cv06461
Petitioner:
Xochitl Padilla-Brown and Xochitl Padilla-Barron
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Margolis et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2023cv03882
Plaintiff:
Dr. Fern Margolis, Mayer Margolis, Juan Padilla and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Arthur Padilla v. Jason Black
as 3:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Padilla
Defendant:
Jason Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Padilla v. Jason Black
as 2:2023cv06081
Petitioner:
Arthur Padilla
Respondent:
Jason Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villanueva v. Proterra Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03519
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Villanueva
Defendant:
Proterra Inc., Gareth T. Joyce and Karina Franco Padilla
Thogmartin et al v. Zurich American Insurance Co. et al
as 3:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thogmartin and Jesse Thogmartin
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Co., JS Held, LLC, Edjusters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Padilla v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08430
Plaintiff:
Jose J Padilla
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
