Cases 51 - 60 of 2,582
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rojas-Rivera v. USA
as 2:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Victor M Rojas-Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-892
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL RIVERA
Frederick George Roehler v. L. Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Frederick George Roehler, II
Defendant:
L. Lundy, D. Williams, S. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, Roben Capili and Does 1 thru 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
United States of America v. Rivera-Hernandez
as 24-781
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSE RIVERA-HERNANDEZ
Garcia-Ramirez v. County of Sutter et al
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ramon Garcia-Ramirez
Defendant:
County of Sutter and FNU Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Ezekiel Rivera, et al. v. Kern County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ezekiel Rivera, Soluna Lora and E. R.
Defendant:
Kern County Sheriff's Department, Kern County, Deputy Swords and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
