Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Davis v. Moon, et al.
as 1:2011cv00862
Plaintiff:
Clyde Kenneth Davis
Defendant:
J. Moon, E Clark, C. Schutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lennie Davidson v. Ruffcorn, et al
as 11-35458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LENNIE DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RUFFCORN, Counselor, TRCI, MAX WILLIAMS, Director of Prisons, Salem Oregon, ALECA NELSON and others
Spinks, Jr. v. Lopez et al
as 1:2010cv01886
Plaintiff:
Rush Spinks, Jr.
Defendant:
E. Lopez, T. Lau and C. Schutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 3:2010cv04562
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation , E. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. State of California et al
as 4:2010cv04562
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation , E. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davidson v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv00575
Plaintiff:
Lennie T. Davidson
Defendant:
A. Nelson, Counselor Ruffcorn, Schutts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livia Scotto v. The Corporation Trust, et al
as 10-15834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CORPORATION TRUST, THE HAWAI'I PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY, DCCA and others
Haney v. Rouch, et al
as 1:2010cv00457
Plaintiff:
Bruce Patrick Haney
Defendant:
Rouch, J. Moon and C. Schutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scotto v. Corporation Trust, The et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
Corporation Trust, The, Hawai'i Public Housing Authority, The, DCCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. Adams et al
as 1:2009cv02119
Plaintiff:
Steven C Martinez
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, Edgar Clark, Jeffrey Neubarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
