Cases 51 - 60 of 345
Daniel Billman v. Gutierrez
as 23-15076
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL BENSON BILLMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
GUTIERREZ, First name unknown; named as Warden Gutierrez, USP Tucson
Jose Torres-Hurtado v. USP Lompoc Warden
as 2:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Jose Torres-Hurtado
Respondent:
USP Lompoc Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Torres-Hurtado v. USP Lompoc Warden
as 1:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
Jose Torres-Hurtado
Respondent:
USP Lompoc Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robert Dinkins v. USA, et al
as 22-56096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT O. DINKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USP LOMPOC MEDICAL DR., HOSPITAL DR and others
Robert Dinkins v. USA, et al
as 22-56089
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT O. DINKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 22-16725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Pilczynski v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Robert Pilczynski
Defendant:
USPS and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Percer v. Jeffus et al
as 2:2022cv01438
Plaintiff:
Jana Percer
Defendant:
Stephen Jeffus, USPS, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Jana Percer and United States of America
Defendant:
Stephen Jeffus and USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Crawford v. United States Penitentiary, Tucson
as 4:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Crawford
Defendant:
USP Tucson and United States Penitentiary, Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
