Cases 51 - 60 of 570
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01486
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2020cv06182
Respondent:
Chad F Wolf, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kathy Nuebel Kovorik and others
Petitioner:
Yang Hong
Moore v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv08299
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Moore
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Social Security Administration, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Opunui v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00506
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Patrick Opunui, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Naki v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00507
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshals Service and others
Petitioner:
Leslie K. Naki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sandeen v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00505
Respondent:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons Honolulu Federal Detention Center, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Andrew A. Sandeen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01826
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
