Cases 61 - 70 of 353
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
(HC) Jacobson v. Saray, et al.
as 1:2020cv01465
Petitioner:
Jonathan Jacobson
Respondent:
Cesar Saray and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacobson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00486
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Nancy May Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jacobson v. Saray et al
as 2:2020at01007
Petitioner:
Jonathan Jacobson
Respondent:
Cesar Saray and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PS) Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01646
Defendant:
Jessica Brandt, County of Sacramento, Diana Ruiz and others
Plaintiff:
Autotek and Christopher Lull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corinne Jacobson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2020cv01406
Plaintiff:
Steven Jacobson and Corinne Jacobson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacobson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05873
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jacobson
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Corinne Jacobson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2020cv06829
Plaintiff:
Steven Jacobson and Corinne Jacobson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gregory Entsminger v. Michael Minev, et al
as 20-16170
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER LINK, MICHELLE WHITE, in official capacity, SONYA EDDINGS and others
Defendant:
PAULINE SIMMONS, KATHY DECARLO, UNKNOWN, Caroline and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY WEST ENTSMINGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
