Cases 61 - 70 of 796
Cherry #310089 v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2023cv02660
Plaintiff:
Laquint Henry Lee Cherry
Defendant:
Katie Hobbs, Arizona, State of, Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kirby #165484 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirby
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, NaphCare, Ashley Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2023cv02611
Plaintiff:
Timothy Huntley Williams
Defendant:
Katie Hobbs, Ryan Thornell, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Miguel v. Yue et al
as 3:2023cv06350
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miguel
Defendant:
Katie Yue, County of Alameda, Richard Seabolt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsay et al v. American Red Cross
as 5:2023cv05987
Plaintiff:
Aiden Lindsay and Katie Lindsay
Defendant:
American Red Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
as 23-3445
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
JANE DOE LS 340, an individual, KATHERINE HYLIN, an individual, E. R., an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
