Cases 61 - 70 of 159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC) Johnson v. Ortega, et al.
as 1:2019cv00311
Defendant:
A Ortega, C Ammbula-Pelayo, Curry and others
Plaintiff:
Quinnell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago P. Pelayo v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2019cv00811
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Central Ford Automotive, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Santiago P. Pelayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Robert Saenz v. A. Pelayo
as 19-15119
Defendant / Appellee:
A. PELAYO, Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GONZALEZ SAENZ
Pelayo v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv06037
Defendant:
J. Bojorquez, B. Greer, D. Moyer and others
Plaintiff:
Saul Pelayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mack et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2018cv04928
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Vaughn, Cameron Shields, Arsenio Pelayo and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2018cv01037
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, as subrogee of Merella Pelayo and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Chris Langer v. Jean Arslan et al
as 2:2018cv05134
Defendant:
Amanda Arslan, Jean Arslan, Soraya Arslan and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Langer
Pelayo v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01326
Petitioner:
Manuel Jose Pelayo
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Ninth District Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
