Cases 61 - 70 of 693
Robinson v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01638
Petitioner:
Penny Renee Robinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pannek v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2021cv01447
Plaintiff:
Penny Pannek
Defendant:
City of Seattle and Lincoln Towing Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greenwich Investment Management Incorporated v. Harvest Gold Silica Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01794
Defendant:
EEE Holdings LLC, Harvest Gold Silica Incorporated, Vast Mountain Development Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Greenwich Investment Management Incorporated
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. PPAS-LV, LLC
as 2:2021cv01893
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
PPAS-LV, LLC doing business as Premier Pools & Spas, Ronald R. Bennett, Jr and Penny M. Ramos-Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Melissa Tardif v. Dr. Penny Borenstein
as 2:2021cv07780
Plaintiff:
Melissa Tardif
Defendant:
Dr. Penny Borenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Penny et al v Monsanto Company
as 3:2021cv07644
Plaintiff:
Perry Ramon Penny and Terry Lynn Penny
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen Malloy v. City of San Francisco, et al
as 21-16544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON and others
Stephen Malloy v. Regents of the University, et al
as 21-16535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, STEVE BUSTAMANTE, UCOP Chief of Ethics & Compliance Attorney, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
