Cases 61 - 70 of 39,151
Gonzales v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3288
Petitioner:
RAUL GONZALES
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Campbell v. Herrera, et al.
as 24-3296
Plaintiff:
SENARBLE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
C. HERRERA, JOSHUA J. TANTON, FREDERICK MARTIN and others
McLeod v. Zero Gravity Management, et al.
as 24-3266
Plaintiff:
KURT MCLEOD, an individual
Defendant:
ZERO GRAVITY MANAGEMENT, an unknown business entity, MARK WILLIAMS, an individual and ERIC WILLIAMS, an individual
Carrillo v. FedEx et al
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
FedEx, Angela Erin Bowles, Justin Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(SS) Hubbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Nicholas William Hubbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Michael Williams v. Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rodriguez v. Keast et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Keast, Benson, J. Issacson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
JoAquin Hill
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Travis Barrett Craig
Defendant:
Clackamas County, James Williams, Jordan Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young, et al. v. Keystone RV Company
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Scott Young and Laurie Williams
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
