Cases 71 - 80 of 232
Arturo Mendez Noriega v. Raymond Madden
as 5:2016cv01400
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Arturo Mendez Noriega
Navarro v. USA
as 4:2016cv00387
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jesus Alejandro Noriega Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rene Noriega v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2016cv01082
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Rene Noriega
Damian Noriega v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00927
Petitioner:
Damian Noriega
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. DRG Fence Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02059
Defendant:
Business Alliance Insurance Company, DRG Fence Incorporated and Randy Joseph Noriega
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chavez v. PVH Corporation
as 5:2013cv01797
Plaintiff:
Jessie Chavez
Defendant:
PVH Corporation, PVH Retail Stores, LLC and Tommy Hilfiger Retail, LLC
Petitioner:
Melissa Wiggs, Jodi Scott-George and ADP, LLC
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Lapan and Ashwin Chandra
Not Classified By Court:
Danah Lapan, Dakkar Hunter, Bryan Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Noriega # 206116 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02582
Petitioner:
Edward Eulalio Noriega
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baron-St.Laurent v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2015cv02348
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rene Baron-St.Laurent
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Corey Nelson, Michelle Burlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
