Cases 71 - 80 of 218
Wendy Gish, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-55445
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT LOVINGGOOD, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor, KAREN SPIEGEL, in her official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor, JANICE RUTHERFORD, in her official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA WOOD, WENDY GISH, PATRICK SCALES and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; MEN OF REFORM JUDAISM; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE CHURCHES OF CHRIST IN THE USA; RECONSTRUCTING JUDAISM; RECONSTRUCTIONIST RABBINICAL and FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION
Thomas Few v. UTLA, et al
as 20-55338
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES, AUSTIN BEUTNER and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS FEW
Gary M. Davis v. Warren L. Mongomery et al
as 2:2020cv02955
Petitioner:
Gary M. Davis
Respondent:
Warren L. Mongomery and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bethany Mendez, et al v. CTA, et al
as 20-15394
Defendant / Appellee:
NORM ENFIELD, in his official capacity as Chino Valley Unified School District Superintendent, FREMONT UNIFIED DISTRICT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, KIM WALLACE, in her official capacity as Fremont Unified School District Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT CARPENTER, LINDA LEIGH-DICK, AUDREY STEWART and others
Douglas Smith, et al v. Teamsters Local 2010, et al
as 19-56503
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, BETTY YEE, in her official capacity as State Controller of California and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL HOMSTAD and DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
ADAM DAY, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The California State University
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 19-56408
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, SONIA ANGELL, Dr., Director of the California Department of Public Health and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, THE HUMANE LEAGUE, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTH AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF UTAH and others
Cara O'Callaghan, et al v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 19-56271
Defendant / Appellee:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010, JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as President of the University of California and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENEE MISRAJE and CARA O'CALLAGHAN
Defendant:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Barber v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Simon, Attorney General of North Carolina, Attorney General of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Robert Demos et al v. The State Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2019cv08043
Defendant:
The Governor of The State of California, The Governor of The State of South Dakota, The Virginia Company and others
Plaintiff:
John R Demos, Jr., The Society of T.R.U.T.H. and John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irene Seager v. UTLA, et al
as 19-55977
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES, AUSTIN BEUTNER, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRENE SEAGER, individually and as representative of the requested classes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
