Cases 71 - 80 of 230
Goodman v. Donnelly et al
as 2:2017cv04233
Plaintiff:
Gregory Edward Goodman
Defendant:
Laura Donnelly, Laurie LeClair, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Trevino v. E. Dotson, et al
as 17-17216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT TREVINO
Defendant - Appellee:
E. DOTSON, D. AMBRIZ, D. VEGA and others
Dotson v. Baugham
as 2:2017cv02223
Petitioner:
Ernest Dotson
Respondent:
D. Baugham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tai et al v. JC Funding-5, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02588
Defendant:
Jeff N. Crossland, D-Design LNO Inc., Leslie Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Golden Essence Global Limited, ShuiKee Company Limited and Gary Tai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dotson v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv01199
Plaintiff:
Edwina Dotson
Defendant:
Darrel Adams, Scott Kernan, Robert Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loretta Little, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 17-80178
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LORETTA LITTLE, BRENDA ANDERSON, STELLA BATTEN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC.
Dominic Artis, et al v. University of Oregon, et al
as 17-35560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINIC ARTIS and DAMYEAN DOTSON
Plaintiff:
BRANDON AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, SANDY WEINTRAUB, CHICORA MARTIN and others
Brandon Austin, et al v. University of Oregon, et al
as 17-35559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON AUSTIN
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC ARTIS and DAMYEAN DOTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, SANDY WEINTRAUB, CHICORA MARTIN and others
Tyrone Craig Dotson v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2017cv03907
Petitioner:
Tyrone Craig Dotson
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dotson v. Harris
as 2:2017cv00874
Petitioner:
Charles A. Dotson
Respondent:
Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
