Cases 71 - 80 of 21,599
Loeffler v. Ravalli County et al
as 9:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dan Robert Loeffler
Defendant:
Ravalli County, Jarin Gassett, Keenan Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Jotena Carter, et al. v. Cambridge Sierra Holdings, LLC
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOTENA CARTER, ROBBI CARTER, TRACI SCOTT and others
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE SIERRA HOLDINGS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hosseinyoun v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 3:2024cv02809
Plaintiff:
Tanya Hosseinyoun
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Jill Scott and Brett Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(PC) Brenner v. Shirley et al
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Zachary Will Brenner
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, James Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
