Cases 71 - 80 of 336
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al
as 21-15197
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant:
NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zepeda v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Director Charles Daniels, Home Health Care and Warden Perry Russell
Plaintiff:
Marcial Zepeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00252
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jose Ramirez Cruz, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73606
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL RAMIREZ CRUZ, ROXANA DEL CARMEN DURAN-ZEPEDA and JORDAN DANIEL RAMIREZ-DURAN
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Bonilla v. Tavill et al
as 4:2020cv07711
Defendant:
Maria Carbajal, Erika Montes, Elizabeth Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Valencia Gutierrez, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73040
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS VALENCIA GUTIERREZ, MARIA RUBI VALENCIA ZEPEDA and ANGELINA ZEPEDA CHAVEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ulises Paez-Zepeda v. William Barr
as 20-72944
Petitioner:
ULISES PAEZ-ZEPEDA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Iris Torres Zepeda, et al v. William Barr
as 20-72797
Petitioner:
KATHERINE CRISTAL CAPI TORRES, IRIS LILIANA TORRES ZEPEDA and JATZIRI NICOLE GONZALEZ TORRES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
